How big of a difference is there between these two? I mean, I'm looking for a 20D as a second body, but is the 10D much different? If it saves me a few bucks, is it worth it to save a few?
It was a good camera in it's day...but the 20D is much better. The slow start up isn't really a big deal...unless you are used to a faster camera...then it's excruciatingly slow.
Also of note: the 10D, even though it has an APS-C sized sensor, is not compatible with Canon EF-S lenses.
no it's not worth it. The 10D is slower than snot. You can shoot off 5 images in the time it takes for the 10D to bring up the playback.
The Canon EOS-10D Digital SLR: Part 4::
Digital vs. film | Canon EOS-10D. Building simple web pages Part 1 | Introduction | News | The EOS-20D | Links | Why I chose the 10D | Lenses | Accessories
http://www.normankoren.com/EOS-10D_3.htmlHOME |
I used to use 10D's when I was living in Seattle and the slow operation got in the way of shooting.
the 10D taking 2 seconds to startup should be a sign of the entire camera's lack of responsiveness
 Challenging Books For A 14 Year Old?
 First guitar : acoustic or electric?
|
10D vs 20D