Would this be a good all around lense for weddings and portraits?
Sigma 24-70 mm f/2.8 EX DF Lens for Nikon
The rest of my bag contains:
Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 Baby Photography- Maternity Photography - Commercial Photography :: New Image Studio are portrait photographers in Raleigh NC provide Commercial While we all share some common elements, each child is unique, . Hertford, Morrisville, North Hills, Northside, Pittsboro, Research Triangle Park, Portrait Photographers, Portrait Photography, Wedding Portrait, Wedding Portraits http://www.partypop.com/Vendors/4126654.htmHOME | sports photographs ยป Meonshore Studios Blog: Hampshire Wedding :: Meonshore Studios Blog: Hampshire Wedding Photography, Portrait Photography, Commercial Photography in Hampshire,West Sussex, Berkshire and Dorset http://meonshoreweddings.com/newblog/tag/sports-photographs/HOME |
Nikkor 18-55 Kit lense (it never sees any use)
What is the best (most versitile lense for weddings and portraits without breaking the bank? I've heard that the 17-55 f2.8 is good, but is it $1200 good?
Welcome to the forum.
For wedding photography...you will really benefit by having fast lenses...that means for zoom lenses, having a maximum aperture of F2.8. The ultra wide angle is is probably OK though...as it probably won't get used all that much. 1:: File Format: Microsoft Word - View as HTMLMostly been promoting Wedding Photography and learning to design contemporary I have enjoyed doing some infant photos, as well as family, senior, I took a weeklong Wedding & Portrait workshop through GLIP a couple of years ago. doing research on fiber optic transmission systems at Bell Labs in NJ. http://www.tacconline.org/uploads/TAAC_Mentors.docHOME | Wedding, Portrait and Event Photography in Washington DC area :: Look close and you will see some of the NCSS organizers in these of research they do, fun in zero G and showed a video about her trips. We were told flash photography would interfere with some of the equipment/tests inside. http://www.raybowersphotography.com/cherry/events.htmlHOME |
The Sigma 24-70 F2.8 is a pretty good lens...but I'd personally find that it's not wide enough on a digital Nikon body. I'd recommend the 17-55 F2.8 or the Tamron 17-50 F2.8 or the Sigma 18-50 F2.8.
The 18-200 VR lens is said to be pretty good for an 11X zoom...but it's too slow for typical wedding work. I'd suggest the 70-200 F2.8 VR for a telephoto...but that's not cheap.
You might also consider having a really fast lens for times when you don't want to (or can't) use flash. Something in the F1.8 or F1.4 range. Portrait Photographers Irvine CA | Portraits Irvine:: The photographers will bring some of their studio equipment that will make your SPECTRUM WEDDING CENTER 8895 Research Dr Irvine,CA 92618 (949) 833-1353 http://irvine-ca.yellowusa.com/Portrait_Photographers.htmlHOME |
Thanks for your response. So, adding the following lenses to my bag would put me in good/better shape?
Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro - $419.99
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 D AF - $329.95
I hear what your saying about the 70-200VR, but I want the biggest bang for the buck. I think that my VR will be a suitable "candids" lens for know. Maybe a $1,700 lens is more down the road.
The best kit for a wedding photographer would be (and this is for Nikon) 17-55 2.8, 24-70 28 and, 70-200VR 2.8. I think the lens you named would be a good start but you will eventually need a good protrait lens and a good lens to use for those candids where you don't always have to be right on top of the people you are shooting.
You can find Nikon 50mm f/1.4 D AF - $329.95 cheaper.....
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?shs=Nikon+50mm+f%2F1.4+D+AF&ci=0&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialSearch=yes&O=deadEnd1.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t
Challenging Books For A 14 Year Old?
First guitar : acoustic or electric?
|