It goes without saying that sometimes it is very hard to compare the science and the art due to their various essence and different ideas which are presented to people. But sometimes the structure of analysis is more or less similar as these two point (science and art) are the contrary parts and the analysis of each should be regarded as the opposition.
Science tries to give the definition to that what is going on around us and art tries to interpret all these actions. Probably, science takes place above the interpretations, but it is more useful and clear when we try to understand the nature of facts. So, the science can state certain points of vision the reality, but art, from its side, can easily break down it due to the close analysis of the surrounding.
The arts are more worried about positive reception of that which is supposed to be, and an explanation of the same. Take an example: as an alternative to breaking down a wheat field into many wheat pieces composed of a stems and vascular bags and pith etc, one painter or poet will merely glance on the real beauty of the whole field and put in writing or paint of what he or she sees. The results will be different and different people are going to have different points of view.
Letâ ™s bring the conclusion according to the point of similarities and differences of art and science. Well, they both are based on the personâ ™s imagination. The creativity of the person will be very important in order to describe the event. Of course, science deals more with observation of given information, but art tries to explain everything as it is seen by the person inside.
The main task of science is to understand, and the main task for art is to percept. It turns to be the main difference of science and art.